0VincentRayne0
Faith
i don't think i could disagree more with this comment. i know for a fact it doesn't take "a lot more work" to be good at tekken. and you can't even compare the engines because tekken is more based off of a 2D fighting engine than anything. if you do want to compare then Tekken seems a lot more stiff than soul calibur (and it is). you can't move as freely in tekken as you could SC. and the thing about viola is that she doesn't fit in with the rest of the SC characters. now put her in tekken where juggling thrives then she will do much better or a 2D fighting game. but even then, I know for a fact you can't pick up the controller and just start busting out combos that the seasoned players do.Tekken isn't retarded, it takes a LOT more work to be good at tekken than soul calibur and in my opinion is the better engine when you are competent with it. And Soul calibur lost the retarded argument the moment viola could tod off of 2K and 3A. Nothing in tekken even compares to that. Soul Calibur is a million times simpler than tekken, which is why its a better fighter for new players but to call out tekken on having dumb stuff is beyond hypocritical compared to SCV. They are both very good FGs.
Look at it this way:
Many tekken players can pick up soul and play competently very quickly, even in tournament. The reverse is much less common.
but i can pick up a controller to tekken (which i haven't played since Tekken 6 came out) and come close to beating a dude that's been on the game since it came out without the long break that i took. pick up a controller in SC5 when you haven't played and be prepared to lose. a lot.
anyway for you to try and point out someone that they are wrong in calling tekken silly then do the exact same thing to Soul Calibur is hypocritical. like i said. both are two completely different fighting games. online people are gonna be the same for both games. you're gonna get cheap ragers and you're gonna get sportsman like players.